Post-truth
Post-truth
- Relating to or denoting
circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public
opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief – The Oxford Dictionary’s
word of the year.
How the f**k
does a Donald Trump happen? He’s the
kind of guy at a party who knows everything about everything, the kind of guy a
lot of us try to avoid because it’s impossible to have a normal conversation
with him. Name a topic and he’ll know
more than you. I’ll give you an example. “I know
more about ISIS than the generals do.”
A normal response to a statement like that would be “you’re a f**king
idiot” and find another place to be. But
he’s the presidential candidate for the Republican party. The seriousness of the office to which he aspires
can’t be ignored. So, the media, the
public and, more specifically, other candidates are forced to reason with the pronouncements,
prognostications and suppositions of this megalomaniac with the mental age of a
12-year-old intent on being right with no interest in the truth.
He says, “All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me - consciously or
unconsciously. That's to be expected.”
How can a person reason
with that? The argument is
circular. If the woman shows interest,
it’s to be expected. If she says she’s
not interested, she really is. She’s
just not conscious of it.
He says, “The concept
of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S.
manufacturing non-competitive.” Where did that come from? Where would he find evidence to support such
an outrageous claim? As a
toddler, my middle child prefaced her contemplations with “in my special mind.” Similarly,
the idea of global warming must have been a product of Donald Trump’s special
mind. He’s come up with all kinds of
spectacular contemplations and pronouncement like:
“I will build a great, great wall on our
southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words.”
“Ariana Huffington is unattractive, both inside and out. I fully
understand why her former husband left her for a man – he made a good
decision.”
“You know, it really doesn’t matter what the media write as long as
you’ve got a young, and beautiful piece of ass.”
"When Mexico sends its people, they're
not sending their best. They're sending people that have lots of problems...they're
bringing drugs, they're bringing crime. They're rapists."
"Donald J. Trump is calling for a total
and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's
representatives can figure out what is going on."
Banksy - West Bank, Israel |
Will he really build a wall and force the Mexican people to
pay for it? Does it matter? What does Donald know about Adriana
Huffington? Or relationships besides
tits and ass? In other words, let’s just
skip to the swim suit competition. Or
Mexicans? What does he know about their
motivations for risking their lives to leave?
Is he even aware of the murder rates caused by cartels and indirectly,
his country’s war on drugs?
Like any other creations of a special mind, reality is irrelevant. I am reminded of Karl Pilkington, that round headed idiot Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant would interrogate and torment on the Ricky Gervais Podcast that ran in the early 2000s. Karl wondered, "Does the brain control you or are you controlling the brain? I don't know if I'm in charge of mine.” And, " The way we have nails on our toes, it would be good to have the same protective stuff on our heads and knees, because it can take a battering.” Or travel, “You can be into travelling, but the world’s only so big innit? So, eventually you’re gonna run out of places to visit, whereas biscuit . . . there’s loads of them.” Amusing stuff. Jon Stewart was positively euphoric when Donald Trump announced that he would run for president but back then, he just thought he was funny.
The famous round head of Karl Pilkington |
The existence of a Donald Trump does not surprise. It’s his larger coterie of followers that’s
amazing. But who are they? Allow me to imagine.
1. Donald’s people include, for lack of a better
term, gun nuts, the guys (and some gals) who live in that alternate reality
where the world is safer with a gun than without. They imagine themselves alone in their house
(or apartment), and suddenly, hear someone just outside their bedroom. Maybe the trespasser is a simple burglar, or
maybe he’s there as part of a gang there to rape and pillage the owner and his
loved one. Fortunately, there’s the AR-15
right next to the bed ready to protect the home owner and his loved ones. And, the owner knows how to use this military
grade weapon ‘cause he’s been practicing on the range. Sure, he might have heard that there’s been
a lot of gun deaths in the U.S.; like 165,000 between 2010 and 2014. But that’s just an even greater reason to
own a gun for protection against all the bad guys who do.
The fact is that there’s a greater chance that he’s going to use it on himself than someone else ‘cause of all those gun deaths that took place between 2010 and 2014, 102,557 were suicides. About 62%. And, if he doesn’t use it on himself, there’s way more chance that he’s going to use it on someone he knows or loves ‘cause that’s just what happens. It’s a fact even if it’s not a feeling.
The fact is that there’s a greater chance that he’s going to use it on himself than someone else ‘cause of all those gun deaths that took place between 2010 and 2014, 102,557 were suicides. About 62%. And, if he doesn’t use it on himself, there’s way more chance that he’s going to use it on someone he knows or loves ‘cause that’s just what happens. It’s a fact even if it’s not a feeling.
American Gun show |
2. Donald’s people fear being killed by a
terrorist even if there’s a 1 in a 20 million chance of that happening in the
U.S., about the same chance of being killed by a piece of furniture.
Nevertheless, a threat’s a threat so it’s good thing that Donald’s got a
10-point
plan on immigration, one that won’t allow Syrians seeking refuge from a
civil war where between 301,781
and 470,000 have actually been
killed.
3.
Donald’s
people believe that through the magic of being “the greatest president for jobs that God ever
created”, Donald will somehow, like magic, bring 25 million more jobs to the workplace. And they’ll be those good paying jobs in manufacturing
and coal mining once enjoyed by the middle class, who now, more often than not,
occupy a rung somewhat lower. Those jobs
are never coming back ‘cause they no longer exist. Sure, factories could return to the U.S. like
they’re already doing except the jobs aren’t going to come with them because
they’re now being done by robots.
Companies eliminate transportation costs and they can directly oversee production.2
So, I’ll be waiting with everyone else
for this man to “pull a rabbit out of the hat” as Bullwinkle used to say.
4. Donald’s people don’t usually possess college degrees nor do they make much money so,
they’ll definitely benefit from his proposed tax cuts. Those earning less than $25,000 a year and couples
earning less than $50,000 will effectively pay no tax. That would include approximately 75 million
households or about half the tax roll in the U.S. Donald hasn’t forgotten himself and the other
rich ‘cause he’s promised to eliminate estate tax which at the moment applies
only to those whose estate exceeds $5 million.
And, he says, it’ll all be revenue neutral because the increased income
generated by annual growth rates of between 2% to 3.5% will cover the lost
revenue caused by tax cuts. Some,
so-called experts, as Donald’s people would argue, disagree with their hero’s
prognostications. By analyzing numbers
through a process called quantitative analysis, global firms like Oxford
Economics, predict the U.S. economy will actually shrink by the end of
Trump’s first term, by a sizable $11 trillion.
I wonder where the jobs will come from if that occurs.
5.
Donald’s people trust their gut feeling and
their feeling was that Donald was telling the truth. The problem with the gut feeling is that it
can have no basis in reality. After
9/11, many people were feeling that air travel was no longer safe. They preferred to ignore the numbers reality that
there’s a greater chance of them getting killed on the ride to the airport than
on their subsequent flight. So, rather
than flying, these people chose to drive long distances causing what has been
estimated to be an extra 1,595 deaths of Americans on the road that same year.
Daniel Dale of the Toronto Star counted 560 falsehoods told by Donald during his campaign but each transgression, no matter how egregious didn’t matter to his people. It didn’t matter that he didn’t pay taxes or insulted the memory of a courageous soldier or called John McCain a loser because he was taken prisoner during the Vietnam War, a war Donald managed to avoid after he was called up not once, not twice but five times.
No, Hillary Clinton’s inappropriate use of emails was far worse than the 75 lawsuits pending against Donald, 3500 since 2000. They range from casino-related lawsuits to personal injury suits to lawsuits related it his real estate to suits having to do with government taxes. Of course there’s also lawsuits related to contract, his employees, and branding and licensing. The list goes on. For a guy who called himself the great negotiator, he sure depends on litigation a lot. Donald’s people just have a gut feeling that Hillary’s a crook and certainly worse than a guy who grabs p**ssies and doesn’t pay taxes or contractors under his employ.
Daniel Dale of the Toronto Star counted 560 falsehoods told by Donald during his campaign but each transgression, no matter how egregious didn’t matter to his people. It didn’t matter that he didn’t pay taxes or insulted the memory of a courageous soldier or called John McCain a loser because he was taken prisoner during the Vietnam War, a war Donald managed to avoid after he was called up not once, not twice but five times.
No, Hillary Clinton’s inappropriate use of emails was far worse than the 75 lawsuits pending against Donald, 3500 since 2000. They range from casino-related lawsuits to personal injury suits to lawsuits related it his real estate to suits having to do with government taxes. Of course there’s also lawsuits related to contract, his employees, and branding and licensing. The list goes on. For a guy who called himself the great negotiator, he sure depends on litigation a lot. Donald’s people just have a gut feeling that Hillary’s a crook and certainly worse than a guy who grabs p**ssies and doesn’t pay taxes or contractors under his employ.
Before science, we made sense of nature with belief and
superstition. Now, we don’t even have to
do that. Except by choice and illness,
we have very little interaction with our natural environment. It’s the social environment that we have to
contend with and, it’s in this context that we are only beginning gain an
understanding. Obviously, the pollsters
and statisticians couldn’t predict Donald’s victory.
There is a system of prediction that has been completely accurate
since 1982 when it was developed by Allan Litchtman, an historian, the help of
his friend, a geo-physicist. It’s called
the “Keys
to the Whitehouse” and it’s correctly predicted the winner of a
presidential election since 1984. Instead
of numbers from polls and performance in debates, it measures the performance
of the party in power and its opposition on a 13-point scale.
Hard to believe |
According to this forecast, Trump could have been almost
anyone, even a racist, misogynist egomaniac with a face the colour of pumpkin
who makes up facts as they pop into his special mind. Hillary was doomed to
lose, no matter how vile the competition. We’ve certainly moved beyond the
truthiness popularized by Steven Colbert on the show bearing his name. Donald Trump, on the other hand lives in a
world of post-truth where reality is a creation of his special mind. He’s like Karl Pilkington when he says, "I
find that if you just talk, your mouth comes up with stuff." And for Donald Trump, that stuff becomes the
truth, or not the truth but a special kind of truth known only to him and those
who choose to believe him. A post-truth so to speak.
Comments
Post a Comment